How do we offer honest, valuable feedback to someone else’s precious, creative work? How do we respond to another person’s writing without a) simply patting the writer on the back and praising the piece, or b) going so negative that the writer wants to rip the story up and never write again? One way is through "reading and responding" to each other's work. I prefer that phrase to critique; critique sounds so clinical.
I witnessed the worst-case scenario at a prestigious writers' conference once, where a young workshop participant was so crushed by the craggy, legendary poet’s critique that she packed up and went home. Too sensitive, you say? Maybe. But I believe any criticism that isn’t delivered with integrity and compassion isn’t worth its salt.
I learned this lesson the hard way: I taught creative writing to high school students for more than twenty years. Talk about potential for disaster—a room full of teenagers let loose to "critique" each other's writing! I developed guidelines I believe can work for adults, too.
Many of you are already practiced readers and could offer a tip or two of your own—I hope you will, in the comments—but for those who might not be as familiar with the critique process, here are a few suggestions. None are original to me but common practices I’ve encountered in successful groups.
- Read the piece once without pondering too much. Then read it closely, paying attention to what works and what doesn't. Consider the elements of craft (I'm focusing on fiction)—plot, characterization, language, setting, opening/ending, etc.—particularly anything the writer has expressed concern about.
- Always, always start by identifying something the writer has done well! No generalizations allowed: no “I really liked it” or “Great job!” Those statements may be true, but they don't help the writer in concrete ways. Say specifically what you believe worked well: “The dialogue sounds real; I could hear those characters speaking.” “I was intrigued by the plot turn when . . .” “Your setting details establish the mood of the story.”
- Make specific constructive comments. Notice I said constructive, not critical, which means the comments will be useful. Try couching your negatives as questions or “I” statements: “Could you clarify what happens here?” instead of “That's so confusing.” Or “I didn't understand when . . .” instead of “You sure lost me!”
Some of you may consider this approach too “touchy-feely.” I'm not saying we can't offer tough love for a story. We can and should. If all we want is vapid praise, we probably aren't serious about writing, and we aren't willing to do the necessary work. Being a good reader requires skill, hard work, and thoughtfulness. It's a gift we offer to each other.
Remember: as a reader of someone else's priceless work, be respectful, be honest, be specific, and be constructive!
Please leave a reader tip in the comments to add to the above. I'd love to hear from you.
[Photo by Neenu Vimalkumar on Unsplash]
Len Leatherwood says
Nicely said and I agree completely. Saying what works sets a positive tone and then asking questions, such as, “Could you clarify how old the character is? She seems young, but I’d love to know if she’s thirteen versus sixteen.” Hearing what one has done right helps with confidence; knowing what isn’t as clear provides needed information for strategic revision. Well done.
Gerry Wilson says
Hi, Len.
Finding something positive/concrete to say is SO important. Being specific takes more time and work on the reader’s part, but it’s what most of us need and want. Asking questions is a great way to draw the writer out. Thanks!
Thanks for the additional tip, Len. And thanks for reading!